Meaning That Animals Have Been Suffering - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1505 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2019/04/15 Category Biology Essay Level High school Topics: Animal Testing Essay Did you like this example? Animal Testing Animal testing has been around since 384-322BC (Rachel Hajar), meaning that animals have been suffering for a very long time. Scientists have been using this method to try out new medicines or new surgical techniques to save lives. What they do not get is that humans and animals do not have the same body chemistry which is making it difficult for the testing to be accurate, with the new advances in technology: experiments should not require animals for such inhumane acts. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Meaning That Animals Have Been Suffering" essay for you Create order Instead of using defenseless animals to do such horrible things, scientist should have designed more advanced machinery considering they already have the talent to make new things without needing the help of many resources. This kind of testing is being unjustified; there has been multiple reports of suffering because of all the horrible experiences the animals have to go through. Other reports were the way these animals were living they were malnourished, some of the animals heads were severely burnt and bleeding. A huge amount of money is thrown away to do unnecessary procedures. With this kind of money, we could use it to make alternatives to animal testing, invent new machines that will help reduce the lives of animals at risk. One-way scientist covers up what they have done to animals is by saying they are taken care of and they do not suffer any kind of pain. Since they are the ones with the white lab coats, of course, people are going to believe them. Research has shown that in 2016 alone more than 4 million procedures have taken place, this has caused more than 820,812 innocent animals to die. They do not go through one procedure or one test, one animal can be tested as many as 2 times even if it is already in a lot of pain. Many of the animals used in these experiments are fish, rats, birds, primates, dogs, cats, and sometimes even horses. These animals endure torture that no animal should ever go through. Over 73% of all animals tested in 2016 were mice or small rodents. Scientist prefer to use animals with a non-human vertebrate and cephalopod such as octopus and/or squid. Using animals like these also bring non-effective results in tests, which is another reason it should stop. Octopus and squid do not have anything related towards the human body making them unreliable. Tests are done on animals for many things: chemical, sprays, perfumes, medicine, and makeup. Many cosmetic brands are cruelty-free, and they still manage to have customers buy their products. The European Union has banned cosmetic testing because it is cruel to the animals and not required. Many other countries are following their steps in ending this type of testing or prohibiting brands that use them to sell anywhere in that country. Places like China require their make-up brands to test on animals to sell on their market. Korea and Turkey have stepped back on the testing and they even consider ending it, which would be the good thing to do. Animals do not wear makeup or try to look pretty, so scientist should not force them to be the first ones to try out new products they do not need. It is not a requirement by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to test new chemicals or any kind of product on animals, but researchers choose to do it. This makes it worse for the animals because they are not needed in the laboratories, they are wanted there to try out and make sure things come out as they are supposed to. There are many other useful ways to find out about animals and how they do things, we do not need to dissect frogs or pigs to see the insides; we can find alternatives for this. As a person, you can help in many ways to stop animal abuse not just in labs but also in classrooms and other places around the world like zoos. Before someone passes away, they can decide to donate their body to science for others to learn from, and they can also donate to charities who do not test on animals for any kind of medicine or any type of harmful chemicals and instead work hard to save them. When a kid is in a classroom and they want to dissect an animal, people can stand up and say no to defend the rights of the defenseless animal. Many more animals are being tested that the public does not know about. The people who are aware of this can help and put an end to this. Dogs are also part of these cruel experiments especially beagles because they know how to tolerate pain a lot better than any other dog. More than 60,000 dogs undergo experiments each year; they are the ones who undergo more experiments than any other mammal. Dogs are cute, fluffy animals and everyone views them as wonderful little creatures, but nobody really talks about the horrible side of animal testing they go through or the torture they endure. Beagles are the most common used dogs and there is no law that prohibits people from doing animal testing. There are people trying to put an end to all animal testing, it is quite hard when there are more people with it than against it. There have been campaigns, posters, marches, and so many more things to persuade people to join end animal testing and help to end all this cruel torture. No animals should have to wonder when the next test will be or when they will die so they will not suffer anymore. They need help and the more the public fights for animal rights the more chances that scientists and researchers will stop and free the animals and search better ways to test new products that are harmful to the animals. Once scientists finish using the animal or the animal is close to dying, they throw it out and dispose of it. These people in white lab coats make everyone believe that the animals are safe and there is nothing to worry about, they are lying and do not what the public to know exactly what is going on inside these laboratories. Animals suffer physical, emotional, and mental pain every single day they are locked in those metal cages. Since there are no laws saying this is illegal, more and more animals will be hurt and killed. These animals spend all their day wondering when the next test will be preparing themselves mentally that they will go through a lot of pain and suffering. This is extremely sad knowing that so many people love majority of these animals, and so badly they are treated. When animal testing was becoming more common scientist used animals to test a drug for pregnant woman, so it could stop morning sicknesses. Doctors gave this medicine out and it backfired on them, many kids were born with defects and one mother died because of the drug. It is a fact that if scientist were to have used human like methods they would have gotten a lot closer to getting better results. Because of this happening, it also comes to show that we cannot rely much on animals to give out good and positive results, which makes it worse to keep using them when they do not have the same system as humans and cannot give us the results we need. Because the animals do not give us presentable answers, scientists should put an end to testing and focus more on other ways to test things. It has been showed that because of the failed results many people have died or have gotten extremely sick, death rates would decrease drastically if researchers used more human like methods and leave animals out of it. The more doctors give out medicines or any type of antibiotic to patients that have been tested by animals, the more likely these patients are to get sick or even die. Humans and animals do not have the same body chemistry, making it extremely difficult to get accurate results from animals and provides us with negative results. Since animal testing has been around for so long, people still think that is it ok to keep using defenseless animals to torture them to find out about a product and the harm it may do. Some places that have banned animal testing are inspiring other countries to stop and become cruelty-free, other things that are cruelty-free are some make-up brands, perfumes, and even household items. It is not hard to buy and support cruelty-free products, it makes it better for the animals, some people think that because of the testing we have safer products which is not true. Animal testing should stop, no animal should go through this kind of pain. Since we keep developing more and more advanced technology every day, there is no reason animal testing should continue. Researchers have the machines and computers needed to no longer use animals, they should start letting animals go.

The Mexican American Battle For Civil Rights - 1510 Words

Marcela Duarte Professor Ramirez Government 2306 November 20, 2015 Chicano Rights The Mexican American battle for civil rights has been long and difficult but alas necessary. Can you imagine living in a prejudice environment and as consequence not being able to exercise your rights as a citizen? The past notion of minorities not having the same rights as the anglo majorities is simply absurd. The injustice that Mexican Americans have experienced in the past is undeniably discriminatory. Justice and reasoning played an important part over the years in dismantling such bigotry. A few notable figures, movements, and court cases in Mexican American history that helped pave the way for obtaining civil rights include: George I. Sanchez,†¦show more content†¦According to him the assimilation of the people would produce influence in the white community. Such belief was not entirely accepted but still remains a significant part of his history. Regardless of that, his involvement with education is highly reminiscent because he fought for the liberty to have equal rights in such matter, it should be considered a priority at most. As a professor at the University of Texas, he continued his endeavor of obtaining opportunities for the Mexican American community. Such work had to with desegregating based on language proficiency as well as unfairness in standardized tests. He was a member of many organizations and councils that served for humanitarian prosperity and advancement of the people. As a member of LULAC, he represented their mission to advocate for the betterment in all prosperous matters, including civil rights, for all Latin American people. In the case of Hernandez vs. Texas, which took place in the 1950s, an all white jury sentenced a man of Mexican American descent, named Pete Hernandez to life for murder. His attorney in accordance to LULAC, was assisted by none other than the brilliant civil rights lawyer of the time, Gustavo C. Garcia. The defense team went out of

To what extent did Shakespeare make us believe that the Friar was to blame for the tragic events that happened in Romeo and Juliet Essay Example For Students

To what extent did Shakespeare make us believe that the Friar was to blame for the tragic events that happened in Romeo and Juliet? Essay In Shakespeares play, Romeo and Juliet, Friar Laurence plays a major role; in the impossible marriage of Romeo and Juliet, Juliets death plan as well as in Romeos death. Without the Friar many crucial and tragic events would not have happened in Romeo and Juliet, but how much does Shakespeare convince us that the Friar is to blame for the tragic ending, and that he is the sole influence that drives Romeo and Juliet to end their lives so terribly? The Friar is established as an honoured man, who sells herbs and medicines to the people of Verona and is an ancient pharmacist, who produces potions for both causes of good and evil. He makes his first appearance in the play at the beginning of Act Two, Scene 3, during which Shakespeare gives us a background to his thoughts and personality through his short lecture on herbal drugs that can kill and cure. O, mickle is the powerful grace that lies/ In plants, herbs, stones, and their true qualities. For naught so vile that on earth doth live / But to the earth some special good doth give; / Nor aught so good but, strained from that fair use, / Revolts from true birth, stumbling on abuse. and Wisely, and slow. They stumble that run fast. give the impression that he is a wise and intelligent man, and from his speech you get the impression that he is good-hearted and has good intentions. The Friars close relationship with Romeo is also revealed in this scene, as Romeo confesses his love for Juliet to Friar Laurence, who is clearly accustomed to hearing Romeos confessions of love and who has evidently given him advice in the past. His knowledge of Romeos life builds the reputation that he is a man of trust, not one that would deceive a true friend, although other parts of the speech indicate a slight foreshadowing of the incidents that will occur Within the infant rind of this small flower / Poison hath residence, and medicine power; / Full soon the canker death eats up that plant. In this way, it would seem that Shakespeare is leading us to believe that the Friar is to some extent in control of the story and the plotline, and will play a vital part in the scenes ahead whether it is for the good of his own intentions or for Romeo and Juliets benefits. Perceptibly this morality literally applies to the drug that he will provide for Juliet, as well as the poison that Romeo takes to kill himself. However, it also surely reflects upon the romance around which the play centres, though the Friars meaning is questionable. Does he mean that love is true when it is freely given, but unworthy when it is used as the to ol for politics and agreements (between the Capulets and the Montagues) as modern audiences might assume, or does he mean that lawful married love is honourable and that it becomes sinful when it is carried out for unhonest desires amidst the shame of stoln contracts? After all, Friar Laurence does not immediately approve of Romeos plan to marry Juliet, and asks him Is Rosaline, that thou didst love so dear,/ So soon forsaken? In this scene the use of the Friars formal language of rhyme and proverbs as opposed to Romeos romantic poetry stresses the need for caution towards Romeo and represents the Friar as a fatherly sort of figure. As well as this, the Friars sophisticated tone of language shows his wisdom and understanding, which does change later in the play as he begins to get more desperate and uncertain of his actions. This change of character and decrease in confidence leads the audience to believe that perhaps the Friars plan is not so well-thought out after all and gives them reason to doubt that the Friar is an all-knowing wise man who knows what to do in problematic situations. Romeos arguments in favour of his current love for Juliet are hardly very creditable: Her I love now/ Does grace for grace, and love for love allow/ The other did not. In this scene (Act 2 Scene 3), Shakespeare shows Romeo as irrational and impatient, determined to marry Juliet after only one brief encounter the previous evening. The Friar even tries desperately to convince Romeo that he is being far too hasty, and that he should hold back and think about his true feelings if he is acting on impulse or if it is true love So soon forsaken? Young mens love then lies/ Not truly in their hearts, but in their eyes. In this way, the Friar does do the right thing and does seem to respond to what the audience is actually thinking at this point (have they not only seen each other once? Is it not only the next day?). Shakespeare gives the audience someone to relate to and this builds up the trust between the audience and the Friar at the start of the play for additional dramatic effect later on. Friar Laurence does agree to help Romeo and Juliet as he is convinced by Romeos sincerity, but for a specific reason (in one respect, as he says), specifically that This alliance may so happy prove/ To turn your households rancour to pure love. Here the audience is given the idea that the Friars intentions are in fact good to resolve the everlasting feud between the Capulets and the Montagues. Looked at more closely, Friar Laurence could be accused of helping to arrange Romeo and Juliets marriage for reasons that have nothing to do with their love; though he wants to create peace, he is arguably as keen to use marriage for the purposes of alliance as Juliets father is when he attempts to make Juliet marry Paris. As things get more twisted and the plot thickens, the Friars motive for marrying Romeo and Juliet evidently leads to destruction, as everybody seems to keep secrets from each other for different purposes; whether it is for love, hate or for carrying on the family name. It is impossible that all of these plans will turn out well at least some will fail, and even though the Friar may be portrayed as a trigger for the chain of tragic events that follow, it cannot be all down to him. Shakespeare,Renaissance,Queen Elizabeth, and Elizabethan TheaterReferring back to the play, even after Mercutios death and Romeos banishment Friar Laurence does not see the destructiveness of Romeo and Juliets marriage. Instead he continues to attempt to keep Romeo and Juliet together. However, his plan is short-sighted, poorly thought out and risky. Friar Laurence devises the plan in haste and in desperation simply because Juliet is there in his presence threatening suicide rather than to marry Paris. Unless thou tell me how I may prevent it. / If, in thy wisdom thou canst give no help, / Do but call my resolution wise, / And with this knife Ill help it presently (Act 4 Scene 1). To appease Juliet, Friar Laurence gives her a potion to consume that will enable her to feign death, by this means avoiding her marriage to Paris. He calls his plan as desperate as an execution as he is telling her of it which is quite an ironic thing to say, as it suggests that if Juliet does decide to go ahead with his plan she could get killed in an exceptionally painful death approximating an execution, and his language here is indeed desperate. The fact that the Shakespeare gives the Friar language that causes him to appear extremely desperate and distressed at this point triggers you to begin to worry; given that he is established at the start of the play as a very wise, knowledgeable and holy man who can even prefigure some of the events that do in fact take part later on, this gives you more reason to consider that something is not quite right and that the plan is perhaps not working as well as anticipated. In addition, is Friar Laurence attempting to get himself out of the mess he has created by planning Juliets stimulated death? If Juliet did, to her dismay, get married to County Paris, she would have been a wife to two different men. In Shakespearean times, marriage laws were extremely strict and therefore this double marriage would ultimately have resulted in the Friars execution. This situation leads you to believe that Friar Laurence may just be acting on his own agenda, trying to save himself from the situation that he has put himself in rather than Romeo and Juliet, therefore giving you more reason to place more blame on him for the tragedy. More to the point, it is he who almost interrupts the dramatic scene of Romeo and Juliet dying in each others arms with his frantic talking as he enters the churchyard Saint Francis be my speed! How oft tonight / Have my old feet stumbled at graves! Whos there? The fact that he interrupts such an intimate and anticipated scene to some extent ruins the moment, and the audience are quite likely left feeling dreadfully annoyed with the Friar for this reason. In addition he stumbles over the graves, and this was known as a bad omen in Shakespearean times; all the more reason to get the feeling that the Friar was in reality not a matchmaker made in heaven. Conversely, despite all that has gone wrong, the Friar does admit in the final scene (in a rather longwinded speech) that he has done wrong and is ready to face the fatal consequences of his actions I will be brief, for my short date of breath / Is not so long as is a tedious tale. This sentence almost sums up how the Friar understands that his plan was Miscarried by his fault and he is ready for his old life / Be sacrificed, some hour before his time, / Unto the rigour of severest law. This could be Shakespeares way of showing us that the Friar does show remorse to a degree for his unlawful activities, and he is somewhat ashamed of his actions that lead to such devastation. Although the tragedy of Romeo and Juliets deaths is upsetting, the family feud between the Capulets and the Montagues is well and truly over, only because of the Friars plan going wrong. This therefore means that one of the Friars motives for the marriage plan (to make alliance between the two families) does in fact turn out well and according to plan, and some good does come out of his disastrous scheme. To conclude, the Friar is a very interesting character to analyse in Shakespeares play of Romeo and Juliet as there is no true answer as to whether or not Shakespeare was trying to show that he is to blame for the tragedy. He is guilty to some extent, for it is he who is mostly in control of the plotline throughout and could have done differently to adjust the ending, but do we actually want the ending to change? Romeo and Juliet die in each others arms for their extreme love for one and other and the feud between their two families is finally over, despite there being a few deaths along the way. Perhaps the Friars plan is for the greater good after all, as a happy ending would have defeated the purpose of Shakespeares tragedy.

Literary Criticism Perfume by Patrick Suskind Essay Example

Literary Criticism: Perfume by Patrick Suskind Paper Perfume by Patrick Suskind is a fictional tale that takes place in eighteenth century France. This novel is about a boy named Jean-Baptiste Grenouille who has a supernatural ability to smell, but lacks a scent. He experienced childhood traumas which eventually shaped him to be the way he is as he grew into an adult. Grenouille faced a life of isolation, had a desire to be loved, and took advantage of his talents and abilities. Grenouille was born a supernatural ability to remember and discern different smells, but he himself did not have a scent. It was a gift that he eventually took advantage of. His keen sense of smell definitely exceeded a regular person’s ability to smell. He used gift to create his own perfume to get people to like him. However, he realized the affection given to him was unreal. Grenouille used his gift to his advantage to make the perfume, unaware that he was affecting others too. He kept taking more and more virgins for their scent all for his one perfume that he was making. We will write a custom essay sample on Literary Criticism: Perfume by Patrick Suskind specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Literary Criticism: Perfume by Patrick Suskind specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Literary Criticism: Perfume by Patrick Suskind specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Grenouille had lived nearly his entire lifetime alone and unwanted. Once he was born, his mother already desired to get rid of him. â€Å"She confesses, openly admitting that she would definitely have let the thing perish† (Suskind 6). He has been passed onto several wet nurses, a priest by the name of Father Terrier, and a woman named Madame Gaillard. Grenouille lived a life of isolation. Many simply did not want to interact with him, including other children in Madame Gaillard mainly because he lacked a scent. Other individuals believed it was abnormal and therefore treated him negatively. As a grown adult, he then ended up isolating himself from others. â€Å"He had withdrawn solely for his own personal pleasure, only to be near to himself. No longer distracted by anything external, he basked in his own existence and found it splendid† (Suskind 123). Grenouille withdrew himself from others and society because as a child, he was basically